https://www.citynews.sg/2018/02/city-harvest-church-case-apex-court-upholds-reduced-sentences-six/

Last year when both prosecutors and lawyers presented their argument in Court of Appeal, I kinda knew this would be the outcome.
The argument from lawyers was waaaaay more convincing than the prosecutors’, after all.

 

https://www.citynews.sg/2017/04/city-harvest-trial-high-court-finds-6-not-sinister-malicious-reduces-sentences/

(Photo taken from City News Facebook page)

And so, the journey ends.

 

(photos from City News facebook)

http://www.citynews.sg/2016/09/city-harvest-appeal-cbt-was-not-made-out-says-defense/

http://www.citynews.sg/2016/09/recap-of-city-harvest-appeal-defense-seeks-full-acquittal-for-the-six-prosecution-pushes-longer-jail-term/

 

(credit goes to City News facebook)

http://www.citynews.sg/2016/09/city-harvest-appeal-judges-challenge-prosecutions-control-argument-mens-rea-revisited/

 

http://www.citynews.sg/2016/09/city-harvest-appeal-investments-genuine-as-matter-of-both-fact-and-intent-says-defense/

(credit of photos goes to City News Facebook)

 

http://www.citynews.sg/2016/09/city-harvest-appeal-sharon-tans-lawyer-points-out-fatal-findings-of-trial-judgment/

(Photos taken From City News Facebook)

 

(credit to City News facebook)

http://www.citynews.sg/2016/09/city-harvest-trial-appeal-begins/

John Lam believed that investment into Xtron and Firna were genuine investment and redemption of bonds would be made via Ho’s album sales.
Lam’s involvement in the bond transaction were limited and episodic.
There was no intent to cause wrongful loss to the church.
Controlling the fund can be viewed managing the way the third party accessed church fund.

http://www.citynews.sg/2015/11/city-harvest-trial-start-of-sentence-deferred-to-jan-2016/

And so, the leaders were convicted and sentenced.
I am still hoping they will appeal against the conviction and sentencing.
Anyway, my prayer is with them, their family and the church.

Images taken from https://www.facebook.com/citynewssg?fref=ts

http://www.citynews.sg/2015/09/chc-trial-defense-burden-of-proof-lies-on-prosecution/

Somehow I have the impression one of the jobs of prosecution is to throw insults after insults at the accused.
These insults are then quoted by the mainstream media.
The readers then get the impression at the accused are “liars” as prosecution calls.
However, just because prosecution calls them “liars”, it does not mean the leaders are really “liars”.
In the end, I guess the leaders themselves are already immune with such characterization.
It is just not fair for the readers as they are led to believe these leaders are bad people.

Prosecution claimed the leaders misappropriated the building fund money.
In what way was it misappropriation when building fund was invested through bonds?

Victory and good news for the leaders are on the way.
21, October, 2015. The date of their vindication.
Stay tuned.

Images taken from https://www.facebook.com/citynewssg?fref=ts

http://www.citynews.sg/2015/09/chc-trial-edwin-tong-kong-hees-testimony-is-consistent/

Prosecution claimed CHC was a victim of CBT.
Seriously, that’s a bizarre claim.
SC Sreenivasan pointed out before: none of the prosecution’s own witnesses even suspected church lost money.
In other words, is there a victim? None at all.
In fact, I absolutely am confident if any of  the church board members had been asked to testify, none would have claimed CHC was a victim.

CHC leaders are winning as the prosecution seriously have no direct evidence.
The best they do is simply to draw inference.
But really, how accurate is an inference?
Inference is like drawing a straight line between two points and insisting it must only be a straight line even though in reality these two points are part of a curve.

All the best, CHC leaders!